| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3
Comments:
<0> Hey.
<1> Is it possible to write a c++ program using MSVC++6 to work with MySQL 5?
<1> Where can get the library to connect from MSVC++6 to MySQL5.0?
<2> try MyODBC
<3> Hiya!.. can any1 help me with OOP plz?
<4> depends
<4> what are you trying to do?
<5> If it's OOP with C++, and you actually ask a question that requires an answer that's about how to do OOP in C++, then we might get somewhere.
<3> ok thanx.. i just need to know that OOP is used to create real-life objects, which mostly seen in the game or application such as "AC information", however, does OOP also used to program what we see around us such as Remote control, mobile, washing-machine... plz.. and thats all i need to know..!
<4> OOP (or more generally OOD) techniques can be--and often are--applied to a variety of different kinds of applications.
<4> to get an idea of some of the real-world applications, you might want to take a look at DrDobb's Journal, C/C++ User Journal, C++ Idioms
<3> yes, but what I need to know is whether the techniques are applied to program washing-machine, mobile, remote-control .Etc. bcoz these are too a simulator which runs when we set or give it some instruction..
<4> I'll give you a hint: google for Symbian
<3> :-).. the information is not available there but Thank you for trying!
<4> some ppl are so lazy. I google'd symbian, and it was the first item returned
<0> ...er, be careful to type the m in Symbian :)
<0> ...and dp2, you know that CUJ is defunct now, don't you?
<4> I guess not. I guess that explains why I haven't seen any new issues :)
<4> since when has it be defunct?
<0> Was February the last issue?
<0> I forget exactly.
<0> People on a subscription service got moved over to Dr. Dobbs, which was fine so long as they weren't already a subscriber.
<4> no wonder. I know I purchased an issue back in Oct, Nov, and maybe Jan
<4> I got burned by C++ Report and Byte on that one
<4> I had both; both went defunct, and both moved me to Dr Dobbs
<0> I'd had the same problem with EXE Magazine, though I doubt that made it out of England :)
<4> well, I'm glad that Computer Music and Linux Format do make it out of the UK :)
<0> Computer Music?
<4> sure. it's a mag about music production--focusing primarily on soft studios :)
<4> using software like Steinberg's Cubase, MOTU's Digitial Performer, and Propellerhead's Reason :)
<4> one time it featured an article about ardour
<0> Wheee... ISIHAC tonight.
<5> ISIHAC?
<0> I'm Sorry, I haven't a Clue
<5> Ah, radio.
<0> You really should be a fan.
<0> Radio 4, 18:30.
<5> It rarely occurs to me to turn on the radio.
<0> Well, I don't even have a radio. It's all internet now, isn't it?
<5> For me, the main use of the radio is to put Chris Moyles on as loud as possible via my radio-clock-alarm, so that I have to get up to shut the ****er up.
<5> Doesn't work as well as Chris Evans, but it'll do.
<4> lol it's also useful for helping one to stay awoke duing a long drive
<0> http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/comedy/clue.shtml <-- go there in 8 and a half hours, and click "Listen Live"
<0> The internet?
<5> I'm not convinced I have any form of media player installed.
<0> Hm, well, there's a practice episode from 1990 being broadcast at 12:30. http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbc7/comedy/progpages/clue.shtml
<5> Actually, I think I have a real radio in my office somewhere.
<5> Hmmm, probably still in my old office.
<0> Well, not even I can get the Windows Media broadcasts working, without using IE.
<5> Don't the BBC have a Real media option?
<0> Yeah. That's the one I use.
<0> Ironicly, I can't install RealPlayer though, because they don't support Windows XP x64
<0> To alien it?
<0> alienate?
<5> Yes, because I use debian, to which rpm is an alien format, as deb is the native package format.
<0> Hah... Real have updated their package. It used to say "Your operating system is not supported", but was non-specific about why it thought so. Now it says "RealPlayer cannot be installed on Windows XP 64-Bit."
<5> Right, that seems to be working with a little fiddling.
<5> Sounds like some play about conchies on Radio 7.
<0> ConchieS?
<5> conscientious objectors
<0> Oh :)
<6> Gah. VC2005 doesn't seem to do access checking of types in new expressions :P
<7> haha
<6> Why is that funny?
<6> I wanted to force every allocation to go through my public interface.
<6> Actually... hmm. Maybe VC is correct.
<6> ...which would mean como is wrong.
<6> Mikael... are you around?
<7> Uhm, wait. Access checking of types in new expressions?
<6> int main() {
<6> cl*** test { cl*** impl {}; };
<6> test::impl obj; // No.
<6> delete new test::impl; // Maybe.
<6> }
<7> Well, unless you meant to use struct test, or add a public: somewhere, I can't see any reason why you couldn't do that.
<7> s/unless/if/;
<6> Huh?
<6> I didn't mean to do either of those things.
<7> test::impl is private :P So if you meant to make it visible somehow, the code is perfectly fine. I don't get the problem :)
<6> The point is that I didn't mean to make it visible.
<6> Therefore, I think the line indicated with "Maybe" should be "No".
<6> In VC, it's "Yes"
<7> That's weird.
<6> i.e., VC doesn't check whether the type is accessible.
<6> ...but it might be right.
<7> Doesn't seem right.
<6> See 5.3.4/16
<7> ... so VC isn't right.
<6> How?
<6> The implicitly-defined constructor and allocation/deallocation functions are public.
<6> Well, actually, I need to read about the allocation/deallocation functions.
<6> Yeah, they're not implicitly defined, so the global functions are used. Fine.
<6> Actually, I think I was right.
<6> It should be "No".
<7> ... that's what I said too :P
<7> And the maybe should be "No" too, I think.
<6> Ugh, the No always was No, and I always thought it should be No.
<6> I also thought the maybe should be No, but as I said, VC thinks it's Yes.
<7> Well, you're the one that said VC might be right :P
<6> Reading the paragraph I meantioned made me think it might be Maybe.
<6> ...because the paragraph says that access is checked for those three things (plus the dtor, if there's a risk that one might be called).
<6> It comes down to whether the specification that for a cl*** type, new checks the accessibility of T::A, T::B and T::C overrides the idea of checking the accessibility of the name T in the first place.
<6> As for being the one which said VC might be right, I'm also the one who said it isn't.
<6> Heh, VC7.1 doesn't have the bug.
<8> hi James.
<6> Mikael!
<6> You're too late :)
<8> so it seems..
<8> well, had important things to do, like buying beer.. :)
<6> I have to wait until 19:00 to do that.
<6> I take it that you agree that 5.3.4/16 isn't supposed to replace 11/3? VC8 seems to have regressed from VC7.1.
<8> yes, i agree
<7> I'm having fun coding tictactoe in C# :\
<8> there are other regressions as well, like that function type thing i found..
<6> Wait, what was the function type thing?
<6> rhw: Why the hell are you doing that?
<6> Couldn't you at least do Minesweeper?
<7> rehagold, It's for my brother :\
<6> He's old enough to play minesweeper :P
<7> haha
<7> No, he already said he'd code tictactoe, so I can't do anything fancier.
<7> I'm already pushing it by using C# :)
<9> Ummm, let's go back to the part where you claimed you were having fun...
<7> It's not fun. It's stupid and boring.
<9> That's better. And don't you forget it.
<7> I can't even do it properly because it would be hard for my brother to say he coded it.
<9> Remember kids: Coding is stupid and boring. Do not attempt it at home.
<7> So I can't use cl***es or anything "fancy".
<9> Erm, how do you use C# *without* cl***es?
<8> reh, template<typename T = void ()> cl*** .. and T is a function pointer but typedef void p(); template<typename T = p> cl***.. all fine
<7> Def, Well, I meant my own cl***es - other than deriving from Windows.Form.
<9> ah
<6> rhw: Er, why are you doing this again?
<9> heh: warning C4718: 'blah::fn' : recursive call has no side effects, deleting
<6> I mean, he said he'd do it.
<10> hi
<10> why is this program causing gdb to report segfault? http://rafb.net/paste/results/Y5EG9b54.html
<10> I got the startup function from winsock tutorial
<7> Oh my God, I've created a monster!
<7> I can't beat my tictactoe!
<5> That means it's working then.
<7> hehe
<7> Well, it's the ugliest piece of crap I wrote, but it should do :)
<5> Didn't you watch wargames?
<11> hehe :)
<11> shark2: um.. why were you erading a winsock tutorial if you're not using Windows? (or alternatively: how are you getting a segfault on Windows?)
<11> using cygwin or somesuch thing?
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#allnitecafe
londoner + dalnet + ashok
#kl
MUSTI 4 INDIA
jalak dikla
#kl
#chat-world
#chat-world
#worldchat
#india
|
|